Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Mineral"

From StarMade Wiki
(Created page with "I think it's pretty pointless that this category lists a bunch of the old crafting-test blocks; they don't matter and create confusing clutter here for those who don't already...")
 
(Added heading and indent, replied further.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I think it's pretty pointless that this category lists a bunch of the old crafting-test blocks; they don't matter and create confusing clutter here for those who don't already know they're irrelevant. Any objections to removing those pages from this category? Also, I think that, if such a change is made, this category probably makes more sense as "Asteroid" or something, which is where all of the remaining blocks in the category come from. [[User:Heillos|Heillos]] ([[User talk:Heillos|talk]]) 22:21, 22 October 2016 (NZDT)
+
==Remove Deprecated Blocks?==
 +
I think it's pretty pointless that this category lists a bunch of the old crafting-test blocks; they don't matter and create confusing clutter here for those who don't already know they're irrelevant. Any objections to removing those pages from this category? Also, I think that, if such a change is made, this category probably makes more sense as "Asteroid" or something, which is where all of the remaining blocks in the category come from. EDIT: Maybe make a new category to put all the deprecated/no longer used blocks in? useful for keeping track of historical junk. [[User:Heillos|Heillos]] ([[User talk:Heillos|talk]]) 22:22, 22 October 2016 (NZDT)
 +
 
 +
: yeah I think its better that we separate the old defunct resources from the asteroid minerals. [[User:Crimson-Artist|Crimson-Artist]] ([[User talk:Crimson-Artist|talk]]) 05:32, 23 October 2016 (NZDT)
 +
 
 +
:: All deprecated blocks from here moved to Category:Deprecated. I'd also kind of like to somehow connect the asteroid capsules back to here; I don't know if that would mean shifting all of this into the Raw category and calling it a day, or adding the asteroid capsules to here (but leaving them in capsules as well) or maybe even both (asteroid blocks listed in raw+here, but also asteroid capsules listed here+capsules). [[User:Heillos|Heillos]] ([[User talk:Heillos|talk]]) 13:14, 23 October 2016 (NZDT)

Latest revision as of 01:14, 23 October 2016

Remove Deprecated Blocks?

I think it's pretty pointless that this category lists a bunch of the old crafting-test blocks; they don't matter and create confusing clutter here for those who don't already know they're irrelevant. Any objections to removing those pages from this category? Also, I think that, if such a change is made, this category probably makes more sense as "Asteroid" or something, which is where all of the remaining blocks in the category come from. EDIT: Maybe make a new category to put all the deprecated/no longer used blocks in? useful for keeping track of historical junk. Heillos (talk) 22:22, 22 October 2016 (NZDT)

yeah I think its better that we separate the old defunct resources from the asteroid minerals. Crimson-Artist (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2016 (NZDT)
All deprecated blocks from here moved to Category:Deprecated. I'd also kind of like to somehow connect the asteroid capsules back to here; I don't know if that would mean shifting all of this into the Raw category and calling it a day, or adding the asteroid capsules to here (but leaving them in capsules as well) or maybe even both (asteroid blocks listed in raw+here, but also asteroid capsules listed here+capsules). Heillos (talk) 13:14, 23 October 2016 (NZDT)